4.4 Article

Comparison of Chloroflexus aurantiacus strain J-10-fl proteomes of cells grown chemoheterotrophically and photoheterotrophically

Journal

PHOTOSYNTHESIS RESEARCH
Volume 110, Issue 3, Pages 153-168

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11120-011-9711-8

Keywords

Chloroflexus aurantiacus J-10-fl; Comparative proteomics; Photosynthesis; Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry

Categories

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC05-76RL01830]
  2. Genomic Science Program
  3. U. S. Department of Energy Office of Biological and Environmental Research (DOE/BER)
  4. DOE [DE-ACO5-76RLO 1830]
  5. DOE Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-FG02-94ER20137]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chloroflexus aurantiacus J-10-fl is a thermophilic green bacterium, a filamentous anoxygenic phototroph, and the model organism of the phylum Chloroflexi. We applied high-throughput, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in a global quantitative proteomics investigation of C. aurantiacus cells grown under oxic (chemoorganoheterotrophically) and anoxic (photoorganoheterotrophically) redox states. Our global analysis identified 13,524 high-confidence peptides that matched to 1,286 annotated proteins, 242 of which were either uniquely identified or significantly increased in abundance under photoheterotrophic culture condition. Fifty-four of the 242 proteins are previously characterized photosynthesis-related proteins, including chlorosome proteins, proteins involved in the bacteriochlorophyll biosynthesis, 3-hydroxypropionate (3-OHP) CO2 fixation pathway, and components of electron transport chains. The remaining 188 proteins have not previously been reported. Of these, five proteins were found to be encoded by genes from a novel operon and observed only in photoheterotrophically grown cells. These proteins candidates may prove useful in further deciphering the phototrophic physiology of C. aurantiacus and other filamentous anoxygenic phototrophs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available