4.4 Article

Sulfur oxidation in mutants of the photosynthetic green sulfur bacterium Chlorobium tepidum devoid of cytochrome c-554 and SoxB

Journal

PHOTOSYNTHESIS RESEARCH
Volume 100, Issue 2, Pages 57-65

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11120-009-9426-2

Keywords

cyt c-554; Electron transfer; Green sulfur bacteria; SoxB; Sulfur oxidation

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan [19614008]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [181481, 183495]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19614008] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A mutant devoid of cytochrome c-554 (CT0075) in Chlorobium tepidum (syn. Chlorobaculum tepidum) exhibited a decreased growth rate but normal growth yield when compared to the wild type. From quantitative determinations of sulfur compounds in media, the mutant was found to oxidize thiosulfate more slowly than the wild type but completely to sulfate as the wild type. This indicates that cytochrome c-554 would increase the rate of thiosulfate oxidation by serving as an efficient electron carrier but is not indispensable for thiosulfate oxidation itself. On the other hand, mutants in which a portion of the soxB gene (CT1021) was replaced with the aacC1 cassette did not grow at all in a medium containing only thiosulfate as an electron source. They exhibited partial growth yields in media containing only sulfide when compared to the wild type. This indicates that SoxB is not only essential for thiosulfate oxidation but also responsible for sulfide oxidation. An alternative electron carrier or electron transfer path would thus be operating between the Sox system and the reaction center in the mutant devoid of cytochrome c-554. Cytochrome c-554 might function in any other pathway(s) as well as the thiosulfate oxidation one, since even green sulfur bacteria that cannot oxidize thiosulfate contain a cycA gene encoding this electron carrier.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available