4.2 Article

Good agreement between minimal erythema dose test reactions and objective measurements: an in vivo study of human skin

Journal

PHOTODERMATOLOGY PHOTOIMMUNOLOGY & PHOTOMEDICINE
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages 190-195

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/phpp.12049

Keywords

erythema; MED test; skin; skin water content; UVR

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/PurposeThe erythema resulting from the minimal erythema dose (MED) test is subjectively assessed. The evaluator visually grades erythema on an ordinal scale. Both intra- and interobserver variation have been found for this erythema assessment. We wanted to examine if objective measurements could be used to confirm the subjective finding. MethodsOne hundred two ultraviolet radiation (UVR)-exposed skin sites on the backs of 17 healthy volunteers were assessed. Erythema was visually graded according to a 5-point scale [0, (+), 1+, 2+, 3+] and objectively measured by a skin reflectance meter. Skin water content was objectively measured by tissue dielectric constant measurements. ResultsThe relationship between subjective assessments and objective measurements of erythema was found to be linear (R-2=0.482, P<0.0001). A positive correlation was found between subjective assessments of erythema and objective measurements of water content (Spearman's Rho=0.414, P<0.0001). Water content in categories 2+ and 3+ of the subjective erythema assessments differed significantly from the lesser categories (P<0.0001). A linear relationship was found between the objective measurements of erythema and water content (R-2=0.241, P<0.0001). ConclusionObjective measurements of skin erythema and water content after UV exposure were in good agreement with the subjective assessments of erythema, but showed considerable interpersonal variation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available