4.4 Review

UV Signature Mutations

Journal

PHOTOCHEMISTRY AND PHOTOBIOLOGY
Volume 91, Issue 1, Pages 15-26

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/php.12377

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Yale SPORE on Melanoma, NIH [5P50CA121974]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sequencing complete tumor genomes and exomes has sparked the cancer field's interest in mutation signatures for identifying the tumor's carcinogen. This review and meta-analysis discusses signatures and their proper use. We first distinguish between a mutagen's canonical mutationsdeviations from a random distribution of base changes to create a pattern typical of that mutagenand the subset of signature mutations, which are unique to that mutagen and permit inference backward from mutations to mutagen. To verify UV signature mutations, we assembled literature datasets on cells exposed to UVC, UVB, UVA, or solar simulator light (SSL) and tested canonical UV mutation features as criteria for clustering datasets. A confirmed UV signature was: 60% of mutations are CT at a dipyrimidine site, with 5% CCTT. Other canonical features such as a bias for mutations on the nontranscribed strand or at the 3 pyrimidine had limited application. The most robust classifier combined these features with criteria for the rarity of non-UV canonical mutations. In addition, several signatures proposed for specific UV wavelengths were limited to specific genes or species; UV's nonsignature mutations may cause melanoma BRAF mutations; and the mutagen for sunlight-related skin neoplasms may vary between continents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available