4.4 Article

Retinal phototoxicity induced by hydrochlorothiazide after exposure to a UV tanning device

Journal

PHOTOCHEMISTRY AND PHOTOBIOLOGY
Volume 84, Issue 5, Pages 1294-1297

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2008.00404.x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

UV radiation is known to cause acute and chronic eye and skin damage. The present case report describes the occurrence of hydrochlorothiazide-induced retinal phototoxicity immediately after exposure to UV light emanated from a sunbed in a 40-year-old myopic woman. During the tanning session she had always worn UV protective eyewear, except for a few minutes when she took the protective goggles off to put her spectacles on to locate and turn the timer switch off. At baseline her visual acuity was 10/25 in OD and 10/80 in OS. Fundus examination revealed the presence of retinal lesions in both eyes. More specific tests confirmed the presence of a phototoxic macular damage. Hydrochlorothiazide was discontinued, and she was recommended to wear UV filtering glasses. Over the follow-up period (12 months), a slow and progressive visual acuity recovery in both eyes occurred. At the last check the visual acuity improvement was of about 60% from baseline in both eyes. Fundus examination showed only a juxtafoveal flat pigmented scar of the retinal pigment epithelium in both eyes, milder in OD. The constant rise in the number of sunbed users makes the knowledge of UV-related side effects a problem that cannot be postponed further. Awareness of the general public about the harmful effects of UV exposure must represent one of the leading preventive health strategies. Therefore, a careful analysis of the medical history before the admission to a sunbed session throughout a questionnaire could represent an economic and effective measure to avoid further cases of a phototoxic macular damage in patients taking photosensitizing compounds.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available