4.6 Article

Long-term monitoring at multiple trophic levels suggests heterogeneity in responses to climate change in the Canadian Arctic tundra

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0482

Keywords

tundra food web; climate change; ecological response; long-term monitoring; Arctic vertebrates; trophic interaction

Categories

Funding

  1. Canada Research Chairs Program
  2. Canadian Wildlife Service
  3. Fonds quebecois de la recherche sur la nature et les technologies
  4. International Polar Year program of Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC)
  5. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  6. Network of Centers of Excellence of Canada ArcticNet
  7. Northern Ecosystem Initiative Program (Environment Canada)
  8. Northern Scientific Training Program (INAC)
  9. Parks Canada
  10. Polar Continental Shelf Program (Natural Resources Canada)
  11. Universite du Quebec a Rimouski
  12. Universite Laval

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Arctic wildlife is often presented as being highly at risk in the face of current climate warming. We use the long-term (up to 24 years) monitoring records available on Bylot Island in the Canadian Arctic to examine temporal trends in population attributes of several terrestrial vertebrates and in primary production. Despite a warming trend (e. g. cumulative annual thawing degree-days increased by 37% and snow-melt date advanced by 4-7 days over a 23-year period), we found little evidence for changes in the phenology, abundance or productivity of several vertebrate species (snow goose, foxes, lemmings, avian predators and one passerine). Only primary production showed a response to warming (annual above-ground biomass of wetland graminoids increased by 123% during this period). We nonetheless found evidence for potential mismatches between herbivores and their food plants in response to warming as snow geese adjusted their laying date by only 3.8 days on average for a change in snow-melt of 10 days, half of the corresponding adjustment shown by the timing of plant growth (7.1 days). We discuss several reasons (duration of time series, large annual variability, amplitude of observed climate change, nonlinear dynamic or constraints imposed by various rate of warming with latitude in migrants) to explain the lack of response by herbivores and predators to climate warming at our study site. We also show how length and intensity of monitoring could affect our ability to detect temporal trends and provide recommendations for future monitoring.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available