4.6 Article

Watershed responses to Amazon soya bean cropland expansion and intensification

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0425

Keywords

soya beans; watersheds; nitrogen; phosphorus; soil

Categories

Funding

  1. NSF [DEB-0640661, DEB-0949996, DEB-0743703]
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo [FAPESP 08/58089-9]
  3. Packard Foundation
  4. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  5. Brazilian Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences
  7. Emerging Frontiers [0949370] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The expansion and intensification of soya bean agriculture in southeastern Amazonia can alter watershed hydrology and biogeochemistry by changing the land cover, water balance and nutrient inputs. Several new insights on the responses of watershed hydrology and biogeochemistry to deforestation in Mato Grosso have emerged from recent intensive field campaigns in this region. Because of reduced evapotranspiration, total water export increases threefold to fourfold in soya bean watersheds compared with forest. However, the deep and highly permeable soils on the broad plateaus on which much of the soya bean cultivation has expanded buffer small soya bean watersheds against increased stormflows. Concentrations of nitrate and phosphate do not differ between forest or soya bean watersheds because fixation of phosphorus fertilizer by iron and aluminium oxides and anion exchange of nitrate in deep soils restrict nutrient movement. Despite resistance to biogeochemical change, streams in soya bean watersheds have higher temperatures caused by impoundments and reduction of bordering riparian forest. In larger rivers, increased water flow, current velocities and sediment flux following deforestation can reshape stream morphology, suggesting that cumulative impacts of deforestation in small watersheds will occur at larger scales.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available