4.6 Article

Linking community size structure and ecosystem functioning using metabolic theory

Journal

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0246

Keywords

climate change; allometry; size structure; ecosystem functioning; metabolic theory; global warming

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council UK [NE/F004753/1]
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/F004753/1, NE/H022511/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. NERC [NE/F004753/1, NE/H022511/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding how biogeochemical cycles relate to the structure of ecological communities is a central research question in ecology. Here we approach this problem by focusing on body size, which is an easily measured species trait that has a pervasive influence on multiple aspects of community structure and ecosystem functioning. We test the predictions of a model derived from metabolic theory using data on ecosystem metabolism and community size structure. These data were collected as part of an aquatic mesocosm experiment that was designed to simulate future environmental warming. Our analyses demonstrate significant linkages between community size structure and ecosystem functioning, and the effects of warming on these links. Specifically, we show that carbon fluxes were significantly influenced by seasonal variation in temperature, and yielded activation energies remarkably similar to those predicted based on the temperature dependencies of individual-level photosynthesis and respiration. We also show that community size structure significantly influenced fluxes of ecosystem respiration and gross primary production, particularly at the annual time-scale. Assessing size structure and the factors that control it, both empirically and theoretically, therefore promises to aid in understanding links between individual organisms and biogeochemical cycles, and in predicting the responses of key ecosystem functions to future environmental change.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available