4.6 Article

Potential for climate effects on the size-structure of host-parasitoid indirect interaction networks

Journal

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0236

Keywords

aphid; apparent competition; body size; climate change; food web; optimal foraging

Categories

Funding

  1. Linnean Society of London SynTax
  2. UK Natural Environment Research Council [NE/I528326/1]
  3. German Research Foundation [JA 1726/3-1]
  4. Cluster of Excellence CliSAP, University of Hamburg, through the DFG [EXC177]
  5. NERC [NE/I528326/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Communities of insect herbivores are thought to be structured mainly by indirect processes mediated by shared natural enemies, such as apparent competition. In host-parasitoid interaction networks, overlap in natural enemy communities between any pair of host species depends on the realized niches of parasitoids, which ultimately depend on the foraging decisions of individuals. Optimal foraging theory predicts that egg-limited parasitoid females should reject small hosts in favour of future opportunities to oviposit in larger hosts, while time-limited parasitoids are expected to optimize oviposition rate regardless of host size. The degree to which parasitoids are time-or egg-limited depends in part on weather conditions, as this determines the proportion of an individual's lifespan that is available to foraging. Using a 10-year time series of monthly quantitative host-parasitoid webs, we present evidence for host-size-based electivity and sex allocation in the common secondary parasitoid Asaphes vulgaris. We argue that this electivity leads to body-size-dependent asymmetry in apparent competition among hosts and we discuss how changing weather patterns, as a result of climate change, may impact foraging behaviour and thereby the size-structure and dynamics of host-parasitoid indirect interaction networks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available