4.6 Review

New thinking, innateness and inherited representation

Journal

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0125

Keywords

evolutionary psychology; innateness; inherited representation; genetic information; cognitive evolution; cultural inheritance

Categories

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [086041]
  2. Oxford Martin School
  3. John Fell OUP Research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The New Thinking contained in this volume rejects an Evolutionary Psychology that is committed to innate domain-specific psychological mechanisms: gene-based adaptations that are unlearnt, developmentally fixed and culturally universal. But the New Thinking does not simply deny the importance of innate psychological traits. The problem runs deeper: the concept of innateness is not suited to distinguishing between the New Thinking and Evolutionary Psychology. That points to a more serious problem with the concept of innateness as it is applied to human psychological phenotypes. This paper argues that the features of recent human evolution highlighted by the New Thinking imply that the concept of inherited representation, set out here, is a better tool for theorizing about human cognitive evolution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available