4.6 Article

Detecting temporal trends in species assemblages with bootstrapping procedures and hierarchical models

Journal

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0262

Keywords

temporal trends; species abundance; null model; hierarchical model; stream fishes; grassland insects

Categories

Funding

  1. U.S. National Sciences Foundation (NSF) [NSF DEB-0541936]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy [022 821]
  3. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources
  4. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) [GEO-00 144-MS]
  5. NSF [06-20 443]
  6. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
  7. USDA through NSF [EF-0832858]
  8. University of Tennessee, Knoxville
  9. Div Of Biological Infrastructure
  10. Direct For Biological Sciences [0832858] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantifying patterns of temporal trends in species assemblages is an important analytical challenge in community ecology. We describe methods of analysis that can be applied to a matrix of counts of individuals that is organized by species (rows) and time-ordered sampling periods (columns). We first developed a bootstrapping procedure to test the null hypothesis of random sampling from a stationary species abundance distribution with temporally varying sampling probabilities. This procedure can be modified to account for undetected species. We next developed a hierarchical model to estimate species-specific trends in abundance while accounting for species-specific probabilities of detection. We analysed two long-term datasets on stream fishes and grassland insects to demonstrate these methods. For both assemblages, the bootstrap test indicated that temporal trends in abundance were more heterogeneous than expected under the null model. We used the hierarchical model to estimate trends in abundance and identified sets of species in each assemblage that were steadily increasing, decreasing or remaining constant in abundance over more than a decade of standardized annual surveys. Our methods of analysis are broadly applicable to other ecological datasets, and they represent an advance over most existing procedures, which do not incorporate effects of incomplete sampling and imperfect detection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available