4.6 Article

Repeated evolution of reproductive isolation in a marine snail: unveiling mechanisms of speciation

Journal

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0256

Keywords

Littorina saxatilis; ecotype evolution; parallel evolution; selective sweep; evolution in concert; incipient speciation

Categories

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Councils
  2. MEC [CGL2008-00135/BOS]
  3. EU
  4. NERC [NE/G018375/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/G018375/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Distinct ecotypes of the snail Littorina saxatilis, each linked to a specific shore microhabitat, form a mosaic-like pattern with narrow hybrid zones in between, over which gene flow is 10-30% of within-ecotype gene flow. Multi-locus comparisons cluster populations by geographic affinity independent of ecotype, while loci under selection group populations by ecotype. The repeated occurrence of partially reproductively isolated ecotypes and the conflicting patterns in neutral and selected genes can either be explained by separation in allopatry followed by secondary overlap and extensive introgression that homogenizes neutral differences evolved under allopatry, or by repeated evolution in parapatry, or in sympatry, with the same ecotypes appearing in each local site. Data from Spain, the UK and Sweden give stronger support for a non-allopatric model of ecotype formation than for an allopatric model. Several different non-allopatric mechanisms can, however, explain the repeated evolution of the ecotypes: (i) parallel evolution by new mutations in different populations; (ii) evolution from standing genetic variation; and (iii) evolution in concert with rapid spread of new positive mutations among populations inhabiting similar environments. These models make different predictions that can be tested using comprehensive phylogenetic information combined with candidate loci sequencing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available