4.6 Review

Colonization and diversification of Galapagos terrestrial fauna: a phylogenetic and biogeographical synthesis

Journal

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0118

Keywords

adaptive radiation; diversification; evolution; phylogeny; phylogeography; speciation

Categories

Funding

  1. NSF [DEB 322672, DEB 0317687]
  2. YIBSEcosave
  3. National Geographic Society
  4. Paul and Bay Foundation
  5. AWARE Foundation
  6. le Fonds Nature et Technologies du Que bec ( FCAR)
  7. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  8. Unitas Malacologica and the Conchologists of America

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Remote oceanic islands have long been recognized as natural models for the study of evolutionary processes involved in diversification. Their remoteness provides opportunities for isolation and divergence of populations, which make islands remarkable settings for the study of diversification. Groups of islands may share a relatively similar geological history and comparable climate, but their inhabitants experience subtly different environments and have distinct evolutionary histories, offering the potential for comparative studies. A range of organisms have colonized the Galapagos Islands, and various lineages have radiated throughout the archipelago to form unique assemblages. This review pays particular attention to molecular phylogenetic studies of Galapagos terrestrial fauna. We find that most of the Galapagos terrestrial fauna have diversified in parallel to the geological formation of the islands. Lineages have occasionally diversified within islands, and the clearest cases occur in taxa with very low vagility and on large islands with diverse habitats. Ecology and habitat specialization appear to be critical in speciation both within and between islands. Although the number of phylogenetic studies is continuously increasing, studies of natural history, ecology, evolution and behaviour are essential to completely reveal how diversification proceeded on these islands.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available