4.6 Review

Phonetic learning as a pathway to language: new data and native language magnet theory expanded (NLM-e)

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2154

Keywords

theories of speech perception; language development; event-related potentials; effects of linguistic experience; neural commitment

Categories

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [P30 HD002274, P30 HD02274, HD37954, R01 HD037954, R01 HD037954-08] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCD NIH HHS [P30 DC004661, P30 DC04661] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Infants' speech perception skills show a dual change towards the end of the first year of life. Not only does non-native speech perception decline, as often shown, but native language speech perception skills show improvement, reflecting a facilitative effect of experience with native language. The mechanism underlying change at this point in development, and the relationship between the change in native and non-native speech perception, is of theoretical interest. As shown in new data presented here, at the cusp of this developmental change, infants' native and non-native phonetic perception skills predict later language ability, but in opposite directions. Better native language skill at 7.5 months of age predicts faster language advancement, whereas better non-native language skill predicts slower advancement. We suggest that native language phonetic performance is indicative of neural commitment to the native language, while non-native phonetic performance reveals uncommitted neural circuitry. This paper has three goals: (i) to review existing models of phonetic perception development, (ii) to present new event-related potential data showing that native and non-native phonetic perception at 7.5 months of age predicts language growth over the next 2 years, and (iii) to describe a revised version of our previous model, the native language magnet model, expanded (NLM-e). NLM-e incorporates five new principles. Specific testable predictions for future research programmes are described.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available