4.6 Review

Biogeography of the fauna of French Polynesia: diversification within and between a series of hot spot archipelagos

Journal

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0124

Keywords

Society Islands; Tahiti; Marquesas Islands; Austral Islands; adaptive radiation; dispersal

Categories

Funding

  1. Territorial Government of French Polynesia
  2. National Science Foundation [DEB 0451971]
  3. Schlinger Foundation
  4. University of California Berkeley
  5. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The islands of French Polynesia cover an area the size of Europe, though total land area is smaller than Rhode Island. Each hot spot archipelago ( Societies, Marquesas, Australs) is chronologically arranged. With the advent of molecular techniques, relatively precise estimations of timing and source of colonization have become feasible. We compile data for the region, first examining colonization ( some lineages dispersed from the west, others from the east). Within archipelagos, blackflies ( Simulium) provide the best example of adaptive radiation in the Societies, though a similar radiation occurs in weevils ( Rhyncogonus). Both lineages indicate that Tahiti hosts the highest diversity. The more remote Marquesas show clear examples of adaptive radiation in birds, arthropods and snails. The Austral Islands, though generally depauperate, host astonishing diversity on the single island of Rapa, while lineages on other islands are generally widespread but with large genetic distances between islands. More recent human colonization has changed the face of Polynesian biogeography. Molecular markers highlight the rapidity of Polynesian human ( plus commensal) migrations and the importance of admixture from other populations during the period of prehistoric human voyages. However, recent increase in traffic has brought many new, invasive species to the region, with the future of the indigenous biota uncertain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available