4.5 Article

On longitudinal compressive failure of carbon-fibre-reinforced polymer: from unidirectional to woven, and from virgin to recycled

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2011.0429

Keywords

kink band; composite; fracture; unidirectional; woven; recycled

Funding

  1. EPSRC
  2. DSTL
  3. Airbus
  4. Renault F1 [EP/E0Z3169/1]
  5. FCT [SFRH/BD/36636/2007, SFRH/BD/44051/2008]
  6. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/44051/2008, SFRH/BD/36636/2007] Funding Source: FCT
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/E023169/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. EPSRC [EP/E023169/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Modelling the longitudinal compressive failure of carbon-fibre-reinforced composites has been attempted for decades. Despite many developments, no single model has surfaced to provide simultaneously a definitive explanation for the micromechanics of failure as well as validated predictions for a generic stress state. This paper explores the reasons for this, by presenting experimental data (including scanning electron microscopic observations of loaded kink bands during propagation, and brittle shear fracture at 45 degrees to the fibres) and reviewing previously proposed micromechanical analytical and numerical models. The paper focuses mainly on virgin unidirectional (UD) composites, but studies for woven and recycled composites are also presented, highlighting similarities and differences between these cases. It is found that, while kink-band formation (also referred to in the literature as microbuckling) is predominant in UD composites under longitudinal compression, another failure mode related to the failure of the fibres can be observed experimentally. It is also shown that the micromechanics of the failure process observed in UD composites is similar to that in other fibre architectures, hence encouraging the adaptation and application of models developed for the former to the latter.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available