4.4 Article

Anisotropy in hexagonal close-packed structures: improvements to crystal plasticity approaches applied to magnesium alloy

Journal

PHILOSOPHICAL MAGAZINE
Volume 93, Issue 35, Pages 4311-4330

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14786435.2013.827802

Keywords

crystal plasticity; deformation twinning; magnesium alloys; microstructure; EBSD

Funding

  1. DOE Southern Regional Center for Lightweight Innovative Design award [DE-FC26-06NT42755]
  2. US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences
  3. DOE [DE-AC52-06NA25396]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to its polarity, {10 (1) over bar2} twinning in strongly textured hexagonal close packed (HCP) structures can be maximized or minimized under particular loading conditions. The resulting anisotropy can be dramatically demonstrated for magnesium with a [0 0 0 1] fibre, for example. The stress-strain behaviour from compression loading parallel to the fibre produces a 'parabolic' stress-strain curve, but a 'sigmoidal' curve when loaded normal to the fibre. When modelling anisotropy in HCP structures with crystal plasticity, contemporary researchers usually fit hardening parameters to only these two extreme cases, i.e., maximized or minimized twinning activity, presuming that the same parameters would interpolate the correct behaviour under any other transitional stress direction. A comparison with experiments presented in this paper demonstrates that this assumption is not fully accurate, whether using the phenomenological Voce hardening model or the dislocation density based hardening model in the VPSC (visco-plastic self-consistent) framework. This indicates that slip-twin interactions are not properly captured in these models. Through a simple phenomenological implementation, we show that dislocation transmutation by twinning is an important aspect of slip-twin interactions that improve the predictability of the above crystal plasticity models for HCP structures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available