4.4 Article

Hybrid Al + Al3Ni metallic foams synthesized in situ via laser engineered net shaping

Journal

PHILOSOPHICAL MAGAZINE
Volume 91, Issue 26, Pages 3473-3497

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14786435.2011.586375

Keywords

metallic foam; composite; interface; laser deposition; properties

Funding

  1. NASA STTR [NNM06AB11C]
  2. Materials Design Institute
  3. LANL/UC Davis Education Research Collaboration, Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANS) [75782-001-09]
  4. UC Lab
  5. US DOE [DE-AC04-94AL85000]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A hybrid, Al + Al3Ni metallic foam was synthesized in situ via laser engineered net shaping (LENS(R)) of Ni-coated 6061 Al powder in the absence of a foaming agent. During LENS(R) processing, the Ni coating reacted with the Al matrix, resulting in the simultaneous formation of a fine dispersion of Al3Ni, and a high volume fraction of porosity. As a reinforcement phase, the intermetallic compound formed particles with a size range of 1-5 mu m and a volume fraction of 63%, with accompanying 35-300 mu m pores with a 60% volume fraction. The microstructure of the as-deposited Al + Al3Ni composite foams was characterized using SEM, EDS, XRD and TEM/HRTEM techniques. The evolution of the microstructure was analyzed on the basis of the thermal field present during deposition, paying particular attention to the thermodynamics of the Al3Ni intermetallic compound formation as well as discussing the mechanisms that may be responsible for the observed porosity. The mechanical behavior of the as-deposited material was characterized using compression and microhardness testing, indicating that the yield strength and hardness are 190 MPa and 320 HV, respectively, which represents an increase of over three times higher than that of annealed Al6061, or similar to heat-treated Al6061 fully dense matrix, and much higher than those of traditional Al alloy foams, and with a low density of 1.64 g/m(3).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available