4.5 Article

Inhibition of nitric oxide synthase accentuates endotoxin-induced sickness behavior in mice

Journal

PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR
Volume 103, Issue 3, Pages 535-540

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2012.09.022

Keywords

Endotoxin; Nitric oxide; Sepsis; Sickness behavior

Funding

  1. FAPEMIG
  2. CNPq
  3. CAPES

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sickness behavior appears to be the expression of a central motivational state that reorganizes an organism's priorities to cope with infectious pathogens. To evaluate the possible participation of nitric oxide (NO) in lipopolysaccharide-induced sickness behaviors, mice were submitted to the forced swim test (FST), open field test and dark-light box test. Food intake and corticosterone plasma levels were evaluated. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 100 mu g/kg; i.p.) administration increased the time spent floating in the FST and decreased locomotor activity in the open field. Indeed, treatment with LPS decreased the total number of transitions between the dark and light compartments of the apparatus. In addition, LPS reduced food intake and increased corticosterone levels. Pretreatment with L-NAME (30 mg/kg; i.p.) or aminoguanidine (50 mg/kg; i.p.) accentuated the behavioral changes induced by LPS in the FST, open field and light-dark box tests as well as induced an increment in hypophagia and in corticosterone levels. These findings confirm previous observations that have reported LPS-induced sickness behaviors. In addition, they provide evidence that the synthesis of NO modulates changes in depressive-like and exploratory behaviors in mice, which is supported by the fact that NO synthase inhibitors also attenuate LPS-induced behavioral changes. In addition, the present study suggests that NO may have a protective role, acting in an inhibitory feedback manner to limit LPS-induced sickness behavior. (c) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available