4.5 Article

Lysophosphatidylcholine causes neuropathic pain via the increase of neuronal nitric oxide synthase in the dorsal root ganglion and cuneate nucleus

Journal

PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR
Volume 106, Issue -, Pages 47-56

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2013.03.002

Keywords

c-Fos; Neuropathic pain; L-NAME; 7-NI; Electrical stimulation

Funding

  1. National Science Council, Taiwan [NSC98-2320-B002-033-MY3, NSC101-230-B002-006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we investigated the role of nitric oxide (NO) in lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) induced peripheral neuropathy by the use of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitors and NO donor. We found that LPC treatment of the median nerve induced neuropathic pain behaviors (allodynia and hyperalgesia) and nerve demyelination. Immunohistochemistry revealed that the amounts of neuronal NOS-like immunoreative (nNOS-LI) neurons in both the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) and cuneate nucleus (CN) increased and peaked at 1 week after LPC treatment. Following electrical stimulation of the LPC-treated nerve, the number of c-Fos-LI neurons in the ipsilateral CN also increased in a dose-dependent manner following LPC injection and peaked at 1 week. Administration of L-NAME (N-omega-Nitro-L-arginine methyl ester) or 7-NI (7-nitroindazole) 1 week after 4% LPC injection attenuated tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia. However, the application of the NO donor S-Nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP) only exacerbated thermal hyperalgesia. After electrical stimulation of the LPC-treated median nerve, the number of c-Fos-LI neurons in the CN diminished in the L-NAME and 7-NI groups, but increased in the SNAP group. Taken together, our findings suggest that advanced NO made by the dramatically increased number of nNOS in the DRG and CN might be involved in the neuropathic sensation and boosted neuronal activity in the CN after LPC treatment. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available