4.5 Article

Paradoxical simultaneous occurrence of amphetamine-induced conditioned taste aversion and conditioned place preference with the same single drug injection: A new pre- and post-association experimental paradigm

Journal

PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR
Volume 95, Issue 1, Pages 80-87

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2009.12.009

Keywords

Amphetamine; Conditioned taste aversion; Conditioned place preference; Paradox; Pre and post associations; Task-dependent drug effects hypothesis

Funding

  1. National Research Council of the Republic of China [NSC 91-2413-H-194-016]
  2. Fu-Jun Catholic University [209531030165, 409631030413]
  3. Fo Guang University [FGU-R9702]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paradoxical phenomenon of co-existing physically aversive and psychologically rewarding effects of drugs is a crucial issue for drug addiction. The present study employed a new experimental paradigm to test whether the rewarding and aversive properties of amphetamine (AMPH) can exist simultaneously. Rats were given a 15 min period of exposure to saccharin injected with 0.15 M NaCl or 1.5 mg/kg AMPH and then were confined to one compartment of a test box for 30 min. After three paired and unpaired cycles, the aversive and rewarding effects were assessed. A reduction in consumption of the paired flavored solution provided evidence of avoidance while preference for the AMPH injection context provided evidence of rewarding effects. The present findings demonstrate that the development of AMPH-induced rewarding and aversive effects depends on the particular behavioral conditions and support both the task-dependent drug effects hypothesis and the reward comparison hypothesis. The formation of associations with stimuli that comes before (pre) vs. after (post) the unconditioned stimulus and the role of the dopaminergic system in such associations are discussed. Crown Copyright (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available