4.7 Review

Structure, function and pathophysiology of protease activated receptors

Journal

PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
Volume 130, Issue 3, Pages 248-282

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2011.01.003

Keywords

Protease; Protease activated receptor; PAR; GPCR

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [569595, 614206, APP1000745]
  2. Cancer Council Queensland
  3. Australian Research Council [DP1093245]
  4. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  5. Australian Post-Graduate Award Scholarships
  6. Alberta Hertiage Foundation for Medical Research
  7. University of Queensland
  8. Australian Research Council [DP1093245] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Discovered in the 1990s, protease activated receptors(1) (PARs) are membrane-spanning cell surface proteins that belong to the G protein coupled receptor (GPCR) family. A defining feature of these receptors is their irreversible activation by proteases; mainly serine. Proteolytic agonists remove the PAR extracellular amino terminal pro-domain to expose a new amino terminus, or tethered ligand, that binds intramolecularly to induce intracellular signal transduction via a number of molecular pathways that regulate a variety of cellular responses. By these mechanisms PARs function as cell surface sensors of extracellular and cell surface associated proteases, contributing extensively to regulation of homeostasis, as well as to dysfunctional responses required for progression of a number of diseases. This review examines common and distinguishing structural features of PARS, mechanisms of receptor activation, trafficking and signal termination, and discusses the physiological and pathological roles of these receptors and emerging approaches for modulating PAR-mediated signaling in disease. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available