4.7 Review

The hERG potassium channel and hERG screening for drug-induced torsades de pointes

Journal

PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
Volume 119, Issue 2, Pages 118-132

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2008.05.009

Keywords

hERG; I-Kr; rapid delayed rectifier; torsades de pointes; long QT syndrome; QT interval; safety pharmacology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Drug-induced torsades de pointes (TdP) arrhythmia is a major safety concern in the process of drug design and development. The incidence of UP tends to be low, so early pre-clinical screens rely on surrogate markers of TdP to highlight potential problems with new drugs. hERG (human ether-a-go-go-related gene, alternative nomenclature KCNH2) is responsible for channels mediating the 'rapid' delayed rectifier K+ current (I-Kr) which plays an important role in ventricular repolarization. Pharmacological inhibition of native I-Kr and of recombinant hERG channels is a shared feature of diverse drugs associated with TdP. In vitro hERG assays therefore form a key element of an integrated assessment of TdP liability, with patch-clamp electrophysiology offering a 'gold standard'. However, whilst clearly necessary, hERG assays cannot be assumed automatically to provide sufficient information, when considered in isolation, to differentiate 'safe' from 'dangerous' drugs. Other relevant factors include therapeutic plasma concentration, drug metabolism and active metabolites, severity of target condition and drug effects on other cardiac ion channels that may mitigate or exacerbate effects of hERG blockade. Increased understanding of the nature of drug-hERG channel interactions may ultimately help eliminate potential hERG blockade early in the design and development process. Currently, for promising drug candidates integration of data from hERG assays with information from other pre-clinical safety screens remains essential. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available