4.7 Article

Nitric oxide donor and non steroidal anti inflammatory drugs as a therapy for muscular dystrophies: Evidence from a safety study with pilot efficacy measures in adult dystrophic patients

Journal

PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 65, Issue 4, Pages 472-479

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2012.01.006

Keywords

Muscular dystrophies; Pharmacological treatment; Nitric oxide donor; Anti-inflammatory drug; Safety

Funding

  1. European Community [241440]
  2. Parent project Italia Onlus
  3. Telethon [GGP07006]
  4. CureDuchenne
  5. Ministero della Salute Ricerca Corrente

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This open-label, single centre pilot study was designed to evaluate safety and tolerability of the combination of the drugs isosorbide dinitrate, a nitric oxide donor, and ibuprofen, a non steroid anti-inflammatory drug, in a cohort of adult dystrophic patients (Duchenne, Becker and Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy). Seventy-one patients were recruited: 35, treated with the drug combination for 12 months, and 36 untreated. Safety and adverse events were assessed by reported signs and symptoms, physical examinations, blood tests, cardiac and respiratory function tests. Exploratory outcomes measure, such as the motor function measure scale, were also applied. Good safety and tolerability profiles of the long-term co-administration of the drugs were demonstrated. Few and transient side effects (i.e. headache and low blood pressure) were reported. Additionally, exploratory outcomes measures were feasible in all the disease population studied and evidenced a trend towards amelioration that reached statistical significance in one dimension of the MFM scale. Systemic administration of ibuprofen and isosorbide dinitrate provides an adequate safety margin for clinical studies aimed at assessing efficacy. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available