4.4 Article

Differences between human wild-type and C23S variant 5-HT2C receptors in inverse agonist-induced resensitization

Journal

PHARMACOLOGICAL REPORTS
Volume 63, Issue 1, Pages 45-53

Publisher

POLISH ACAD SCIENCES INST PHARMACOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/S1734-1140(11)70397-8

Keywords

aequorin; calcium; 5-HT2C receptor; C23S variant; receptor desensitization; inverse agonist; SB 206553; HEK293 cells

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to analyze functional properties of the naturally occurring C23S variant of the human 5-HT2C receptor. In HEK293 cells transiently expressing the unedited forms of the variant receptor (VR) or the wild-type receptor (WTR), surface expression was determined by [H-3]mesulergine binding to membrane fragments. Function was examined by an aequorin luminescence-based Ca2+ assay. Surface expression of the VR was 116% of that of the WTR. The 5-HT-induced increase in cytosolic ([Ca2+](i)), and its inhibition by the inverse agonist SB 206553 did not differ between VR- or WTR-expressing cells. Preexposure of VR- or WTR-expressing cells to 0.5 mu M 5-HT (3 min-4.5 h) led to a practically identical time course and extent in the reduction of the 5-HT-induced increase in [Ca2+](i). In contrast, prolonged preexposure to the inverse agonist SB 206553 (1 mu M) elevated the 5-HT-induced increase in [Ca2+]; for both isoreceptors. A preexposure time of 4.5 h was necessary to significantly elevate the Ca2+ response of the WTR, but the VR produced this elevation within 1 h with virtually no further effect after 4.5 h of preexposure. In conclusion, prolonged preexposure to 5-HT caused equally rapid and strong desensitization of both isoreceptors. The different time course of SB 206553-induced resensitization of the two isoreceptors might be therapeutically relevant for drugs exhibiting inverse agonist properties at 5-HT2C receptors, such as atypical antipsychotics and certain antidepressants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available