4.4 Article

Kinetic studies of the effects of Temodal and quercetin on astrocytoma cells

Journal

PHARMACOLOGICAL REPORTS
Volume 63, Issue 2, Pages 403-416

Publisher

POLISH ACAD SCIENCES INST PHARMACOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/S1734-1140(11)70506-0

Keywords

Temodal; quercetin; astrocytoma; cell death; caspases; Hsps; LC3

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of the present study was to investigate the kinetics of the effects exerted by Temodal and quercetin on the survival of the human astrocytoma MOGGCCM cell line. Our results indicate that quercetin was toxic and induced necrosis, whereas Temodal induced autophagy-mediated cell death most effectively. The amount of cell death directly correlated with drug concentration and length of exposure. During combined administration of both chugs, Temodal attenuated the cytotoxic effects of quercetin. Combinations of both drugs were effective in inducing programmed cell death, but the type of cell death was concentration-dependent. Co-administration of Temodal (100 mu M) with a low quercetin concentration (5 mu M) resulted in a very significant induction of autophagy; however, after treatment with quercetin at a higher concentration (30 mu M), apoptosis became the primary mechanism of cell death. The sequence of drug administration was also important. The highest number of dead cells was observed after simultaneous administration of both drugs or after pre-incubation with Temodal followed by treatment with quercetin. Apoptosis was identified through activation of the mitochondrial pathway including cleavage of caspase-3 and release of cytochrome c. Autophagy was identified through increased levels of LC3II. Our results indicate that Temodal and quercetin are synergistic inducers of programmed cell death, better together than applied separately. This drug combination appears to be a potent and promising therapeutic relevant to the treatment of gliomas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available