4.2 Article

Tamoxifen metabolism predicts drug concentrations and outcome in premenopausal patients with early breast cancer

Journal

PHARMACOGENOMICS JOURNAL
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 84-94

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/tpj.2014.34

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Robert Bosch Foundation, Stuttgart, Germany
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), Germany [SCHR 1323/2-1, MU 1727/2-1]
  3. IZEPHA, Germany [21-0-0]
  4. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)
  5. American University of Beirut Medical Practice Plan (AUBMPP)
  6. National Medical Research Council [NMRC/1159/2008, NMRCG13161]
  7. Cancer Research UK [19187] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tamoxifen is the standard-of-care treatment for estrogen receptor-positive premenopausal breast cancer. We examined tamoxifen metabolism via blood metabolite concentrations and germline variations of CYP3A5, CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 in 587 premenopausal patients (Asians, Middle Eastern Arabs, Caucasian-UK; median age 39 years) and clinical outcome in 306 patients. N-desmethyltamoxifen (DM-Tam)/(Z)-endoxifen and CYP2D6 phenotype significantly correlated across ethnicities (R-2: 53%, P<10(-77)). CYP2C19 and CYP2C9 correlated with norendoxifen and (Z)-4-hydroxytamoxifen concentrations, respectively (P<0.001). DM-Tam was influenced by body mass index (P<0.001). Improved distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) was associated with decreasing DM-Tam/(Z)-endoxifen (P = 0.036) and increasing CYP2D6 activity score (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.62; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.43-0.91; P = 0.013). Low (<14 nM) compared with high (435 nM) endoxifen concentrations were associated with shorter DRFS (univariate P = 0.03; multivariate HR = 1.94; 95% CI, 1.04-4.14; P = 0.064). Our data indicate that endoxifen formation in premenopausal women depends on CYP2D6 irrespective of ethnicity. Low endoxifen concentration/formation and decreased CYP2D6 activity predict shorter DRFS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available