4.2 Article

Association of chromosome 12 locus with antihypertensive response to hydrochlorothiazide may involve differential YEATS4 expression

Journal

PHARMACOGENOMICS JOURNAL
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages 257-263

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/tpj.2012.4

Keywords

blood pressure; diuretics; hydrochlorothiazide; hypertension; YEATS4

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD, USA) [U01 GM074492]
  2. Pharmacogenomics Research Network
  3. NIH National Center
  4. [M01 RR00082]
  5. [UL1 RR029890]
  6. [UL1 RR025008]
  7. [M01 RR00039]
  8. [UL1 RR024150]
  9. [K23 HL086558]
  10. [K23 HL091120]
  11. [T32 DK007518]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A recent genome-wide analysis discovered an association between a haplotype (from rs317689/rs315135/rs7297610) on Chromosome 12q15 and blood pressure response to hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in African-Americans. Our aim was to replicate this association and investigate possible functional mechanisms. We observed similar associations between this haplotype and HCTZ response in an independent sample of 746 Caucasians and African-Americans randomized to HCTZ or atenolol treatment. The haplotype association was driven by variation at rs7297610, where C/C genotypes were associated with greater mean (systolic: 3.4mmHg, P = 0.0275; diastolic: 2.5mmHg, P = 0.0196) responses to HCTZ vs T-allele carriers. Such an association was absent in atenolol-treated participants, supporting this as HCTZ specific. Expression analyses in HCTZ-treated African-Americans showed differential pre-treatment leukocyte YEATS4 expression between rs7297610 genotype groups (P = 0.024), and reduced post-treatment expression in C/C genotypes (P = 0.009), but not in T-carriers. Our data confirm previous genome-wide findings at 12q15 and suggest differential YEATS4 expression could underpin rs7297610-associated HCTZ response variability, which may have future implications for guiding thiazide treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available