4.2 Article

Genome-wide examination of genetic variants associated with response to platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with small-cell lung cancer

Journal

PHARMACOGENETICS AND GENOMICS
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages 389-395

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/FPC.0b013e32833a6890

Keywords

chemotherapy; genetic variation; genome-wide association; lung cancer; platinum

Funding

  1. National High Technology Project and National Basic Research Program [2006AA02A401, 2004CB518701]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [30730057]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for about 20% of total lung cancer, and systemic chemotherapy is the major therapy for all stages of SCLC. Although most SCLC patients are characterized by initial chemosensitivity to the standard first-line platinum-based regimens, a significant fraction of patients are intrinsic nonresponders. Methods Genome-wide scan of 440 093 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) was conducted using peripheral blood DNA to identify variants associated with response to first-line carboplatin or cisplatin plus etoposide chemotherapy in 245 patients with SCLC and the results were replicated in another set of 183 patients. Results By set association analysis, 20 SNPs were identified to be associated with treatment response, with odds ratios (95% confidence interval) ranging from 2.36 (1.56-3.57) to 4.38 (2.12-9.29) and these results were confirmed in the replication phase. Most of these SNPs (14/20) were clustered on chromosomes 22p11.23, 6q24.3, and 20p12.2 containing BTBD3, STXBP5, and BCR genes. Conclusion Germline genetic variations influence the effectiveness of platinum-based chemotherapy of SCLC and further studies are needed to test the value of these findings for personalized chemotherapy. Pharmacogenetics and Genomics 20: 389-395 (C) 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available