4.5 Article

Development of High-Content Gemcitabine PEGylated Liposomes and Their Cytotoxicity on Drug-Resistant Pancreatic Tumour Cells

Journal

PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH
Volume 31, Issue 10, Pages 2583-2592

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11095-014-1353-z

Keywords

gemcitabine; gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer cells; PEGylated liposome; remote loading; small volume incubation

Funding

  1. New Zealand Cancer Society [3627223]
  2. University of Auckland, New Zealand

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose The objective of this study was to develop high-content gemcitabine PEGylated liposomes to reverse gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic tumour cells. The mechanism of drug loading into liposomes was also investigated. Methods To increase the drug entrapment efficiency (EE) and drug loading (DL), a novel passive loading approach named Small Volume Incubation method (SVI) was developed and compared to the reverse phase evaporation (REV) and remote loading methods. The in vitro cytotoxicity was evaluated using MIA PaCa-2 and Panc-1 cell lines. Results The EE for remote loading was 12.3 +/- 0.3%, much lower than expected and a burst release was observed with the resultant liposomes. Using the optimized SVI method, increased EE (37 +/- 1%) and DL (4%, w/w) were obtained. The liposomes (200 +/- 5 nm) showed minimal drug leakage, good stability, and significant improvement in cytotoxicity to the gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer cell lines. Conclusions Remote loading was not suitable for loading gemcitabine into liposomes. pK(a)>4.6 for basic drugs and intra-liposomal precipitation of loaded compounds were suggested as an additional requirement to the current criteria for remote loading using ammonium sulphate gradient (pK(a)<11). High DL is essential for liposomes to reverse gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic cell lines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available