4.5 Article

The Effect of Polymerization Method in Stereo-active Block Copolymers on the Stability of Polymeric Micelles and their Drug Release Profile

Journal

PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages 1485-1500

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11095-013-1255-5

Keywords

drug release; kinetic stability; poly ethylene oxide; poly lactic acid; polymeric micelle

Funding

  1. Natural Science and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To investigate the effect of polymerization method on the stability and drug release properties of polymeric micelles formed using stereo-active block copolymers. Diblock copolymers consisting of methoxy poly ethylene oxide (MePEO) and poly(lactide)s (PLA)s of different stereochemistry were synthesized by bulk or solution polymerization. Polymers and micelles were characterized for their chemical structure by H-1 NMR, optical rotation by polarimetry, critical micellar concentration by fluorescence spectroscopy, thermal properties by differential scanning calorimetry, morphology by transmission electron microscopy and size as well as kinetic stability by dynamic light scattering. Release of encapsulated nimodipine from polymeric micelles at different levels of loading was also investigated. Solution polymerization yielded a higher degree of crystallinity for stereo-regular PLA blocks. Consequently, the related polymeric micelles were kinetically more stable than those prepared by bulk polymerization. At high drug loading levels, the release of nimodipine was more rapid from polymeric micelles with crystalline cores. At lower levels of drug loading, drug release was slower and independent of the stereochemistry of the core. The results underline the effect of polymerization method in defining core crystallinity in stereoregular block copolymer micelles. It also shows the impact of core crystallinity on enhancing micellar stability and drug release.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available