4.5 Article

Potential Aggregation-Prone Regions in Complementarity-Determining Regions of Antibodies and Their Contribution Towards Antigen Recognition: A Computational Analysis

Journal

PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH
Volume 27, Issue 8, Pages 1512-1529

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11095-010-0143-5

Keywords

biotherapeutics; drug development; fab-antigen interface; monoclonal antibody; structure

Funding

  1. BioTherapeutics Pharmaceutical Sciences, Pfizer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To analyze contribution of short aggregation-prone regions (APRs), which may self-associate via cross-beta motif and were earlier identified in therapeutic mAbs, towards antigen recognition via structural analyses of antibody-antigen complexes. A dataset of 29 publically available high-resolution crystal structures of Fab-antigen complexes was collected. Contribution of APRs towards the surface areas of the Fabs buried by the cognate antigens was computed. Propensities of amino acids to occur in APRs and to be involved in antigen binding were compared. Coincidence between APRs and individual CDR loops was examined. All Fabs in the dataset contain at least one APR in CDR loops and adjacent framework beta-strands. The average contribution of APRs towards buried surface area of Fabs is 16.0 +/- 10.7%. Aggregation and antigen recognition may be coupled via aromatic residues (Tyr, Trp), which occur with high propensities in both APRs and antigen binding sites. APRs are infrequent in the heavy chain CDR 3 (H3) loops (7%), but are frequent in H2 loops (45%). Co-incidence of APRs with antigen recognition sites can potentially lead to the loss of function upon aggregation. Rational structure-based design or selection strategies are suggested for biotherapeutics with improved druggability while maintaining potency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available