4.4 Article

Adrenaline-induced hyperpolarization of mouse pancreatic islet cells is mediated by G protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels

Journal

PFLUGERS ARCHIV-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 456, Issue 6, Pages 1097-1108

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00424-008-0479-4

Keywords

G protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium channels; epinephrine; pancreatic beta-cells; islets of langerhans; whole-cell recordings; patch clamp

Categories

Funding

  1. Minerva Foundation
  2. Israeli Science Foundation [128/05]
  3. Y. Leon Benoziyo Institute for Molecular Medicine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Insulin secretion inhibitors (ISI) such as adrenaline and somatostatin act on the pancreatic beta-cell by a number of mechanisms, one of which is plasma membrane hyperpolarization. Despite the ample evidence for this effect, the principal underlying channels have not been identified thus far. The G protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium (Kir3.x/GIRK) channels, which are responsible for hyperpolarization in other excitable tissues, are likely candidates. In this paper, we show that GIRK channels are expressed and functional in mouse pancreatic islet cells. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis revealed all four GIRK gene products in islet tissue. Immunofluorescent labeling of pancreatic sections demonstrated exclusive islet localization of all GIRK subunits, in part within insulin-expressing cells. Using the whole-cell configuration of the patch clamp technique, we found that the application of tertiapin-Q, a selective inhibitor of the GIRK channels, abolishes adrenaline-mediated inward currents and strongly attenuates adrenaline-induced hyperpolarization in a reversible manner. These results imply that GIRK channels are responsible for a major part of the electrical response to adrenaline in islet cells and suggest a role for these channels in pancreatic physiology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available