4.6 Article

Reporting on Interventions: Issues and Guidelines for Rehabilitation Researchers

Journal

ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
Volume 96, Issue 6, Pages 1170-1180

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.01.017

Keywords

Guidelines as topic; Intervention studies; Peer review; research; Publishing; Rehabilitation

Funding

  1. Mount Sinai School of Medicine [H133A080053]
  2. National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Office of Special Education Services, Department of Education [H133A080053]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Observers commonly note the poor reporting of research, including rehabilitation research. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist (supplemented by the CONSORT extension for nonpharmacologic interventions) has been published for improving the reporting of intervention research. However, the items on these checklists are considered to be inadequate to guide authors as to which information to include when reporting on the intervention(s) studied, and the Template for Intervention Description and Replication, Journal Article Reporting Standards, and the checklist of the Western Journal of Nursing Research are recommended to rehabilitation researchers. The Rehabilitation Treatment Taxonomy framework is recommended as a conceptual scheme to assist authors in thinking through the linkages between intervention ingredients, targets of treatment, and the mechanisms of action linking these 2 areas. Recommendations are made for prospective authors and journal editors who desire to see improved reporting of rehabilitation interventions. (C) 2015 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available