4.7 Article

Incorporating natural enemy units into a dynamic action threshold for the soybean aphid, Aphis glycines ( Homoptera: Aphididae)

Journal

PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Volume 70, Issue 6, Pages 879-888

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/ps.3674

Keywords

biological control; natural enemies; natural enemy units; predation; parasitism

Funding

  1. Pesticide Risk Reduction Program of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
  2. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs - University of Guelph Sustainable Production Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUNDRecommended action thresholds for soybean aphid, Aphis glycines, do not adjust for natural enemy impact, although natural enemies contribute important biological control services. Because individual natural enemy species have varied impacts on pest population dynamics, incorporating the impact of a diverse predator guild into an action threshold can be cumbersome. RESULTSField surveys identified an aphidophagous natural enemy complex dominated by Orius insidiosus, Coccinella septempunctata, Harmonia axyridis and Aphelinus certus. Functional responses of O. insidiosus were determined in the laboratory, while predation rates of all other natural enemies were obtained from the literature. Natural enemy impacts were normalized using natural enemy units (NEUs), where 1 NEU = 100 aphids consumed or parasitized. A dynamic action threshold (DAT) was developed by combining NEUs with an A. glycines population growth model. With the DAT, an insecticide application was only triggered if natural enemy numbers were insufficient to suppress pest populations. In field experiments, DAT provided equivalent yields to the conventional action threshold and reduced the average number of pesticide applications. CONCLUSIONThe DAT approach has the potential to reduce pesticide use, will help preserve natural enemy populations and can be applied to other pest systems with diverse natural enemy guilds. (c) 2013 Society of Chemical Industry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available