4.7 Article

Population and damage projection of Spodoptera litura (F.) on peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) under different conditions using the age-stage, two-sex life table

Journal

PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Volume 70, Issue 5, Pages 805-813

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/ps.3618

Keywords

consumption rate; Spodoptera litura; life table; population projection; Arachis hypogaea

Funding

  1. Bureau of Animal and Plant Health Inspection and Quarantine, Taiwan [98similar to100 AS-6.1.1-BQ-B2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND The common cutworm, Spodoptera litura (Fabricus), is the most serious pest of peanuts in Taiwan. In order to devise an ecology-based and cost-effective control program, we collected life table data and consumption rates from larvae reared indoors at a constant temperature of 25 degrees C, or outdoors at ambient temperatures during the spring and fall of 2010. A computer simulation was then used to project the population growth and damage potential of S. litura on peanuts. RESULTS Laboratory-reared S. litura individuals produced 3548 eggs/female, whereas those reared outdoors produced 3452 and 3072 eggs/female in the spring and fall, respectively. The intrinsic rate of increase was 0.1828, 0.1308 and 0.1545 day(-1) , and the net consumption rate was 194.0, 132.2 and 166.6 cm(2) larva(-1) at 25 degrees C, in spring and fall, respectively. Population projection showed a faster growth and higher damage potential of S. litura in the fall. CONCLUSION Population projections based on life tables and stage-specific consumption rates can reveal the stage structure and damage potential of the pest population. Our results showed that monitoring data obtained by using pheromone traps were not in concordance with the damage potential of the pest population. This approach offers a promising tool for pest management. (c) 2013 Society of Chemical Industry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available