4.7 Article

Pyramiding and evaluation of three dominant brown planthopper resistance genes in the elite indica rice 9311 and its hybrids

Journal

PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Volume 69, Issue 7, Pages 802-808

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/ps.3437

Keywords

brown planthopper (BPH) resistance; marker-assisted selection (MAS); gene pyramiding; Oryza sativa L

Funding

  1. National 863 Project [2012AA10A304, 2012AA101102]
  2. National Programme on R&D of Transgenic Plants [2011ZX08001-001, 2011ZX08001-002]
  3. Foundation of the Ministry of Agriculture [CARS-01-03]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Brown planthopper (BPH), Nilaparvata lugens Stal, is the most devastating insect pest in rice-producing areas. Three dominant BPH resistance genes (Bph14, Bph15, Bph18) were pyramided into elite indica rice 9311 and its hybrids using marker-assisted selection. Gene effectiveness was evaluated on the basis of seedling and adult rice resistance, honeydew weight and survival rate of BPH. Results All three genes affected BPH growth and development and antibiotic factors, resulting in both seedling and adult resistance. Bph15 had the greatest effect on conferring resistance to BPH. The results showed an additive effect of pyramiding genes, the order of the gene effect being 14/15/1814/15>15/1815>14/181418>none. The pyramided or single-gene introgression hybrids showed greater resistance than conventional hybrids, although the heterozygous genotypes had weaker effects than the corresponding homozygous genotypes. Furthermore, field trial data demonstrated that yields of improved 9311 lines were higher than or similar to that of the control under natural field conditions. These improved versions can be immediately used in hybrid improvement and production. Conclusion Compared with controls, pyramided lines and hybrids with three genes showed the strongest resistance to BPH, without a yield decrease. (c) 2012 Society of Chemical Industry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available