4.7 Review

Update on mechanisms of azole resistance in Mycosphaerella graminicola and implications for future control

Journal

PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Volume 69, Issue 2, Pages 150-155

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/ps.3348

Keywords

Septoria leaf blotch; triazole; fungicide resistance; mechanisms; CYP51

Funding

  1. UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) [BBE02257X1/BBE0218321]
  2. Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs through the Sustainable Arable LINK programme [LK09133]
  3. HGCA
  4. BASF
  5. Bayer CropScience
  6. DuPont
  7. Syngenta
  8. Velcourt
  9. SAC
  10. ADAS
  11. BBSRC
  12. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/C/00005193, BB/E02257X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  13. BBSRC [BBS/E/C/00004965, BBS/E/C/00005193, BB/E02257X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review summarises recent investigations into the molecular mechanisms responsible for the decline in sensitivity to azole (imidazole and triazole) fungicides in European populations of the Septoria leaf blotch pathogen, Mycosphaerella graminicola. The complex recent evolution of the azole target sterol 14a-demethylase (MgCYP51) enzyme in response to selection by the sequential introduction of progressively more effective azoles is described, and the contribution of individual MgCYP51 amino acid alterations and their combinations to azole resistance phenotypes and intrinsic enzyme activity is discussed. In addition, the recent identification of mechanisms independent of changes in MgCYP51 structure correlated with novel azole cross-resistant phenotypes suggests that the further evolution of M. graminicola under continued selection by azole fungicides could involve multiple mechanisms. The prospects for azole fungicides in controlling European M. graminicola populations in the future are discussed in the context of these new findings. Copyright (C) 2012 Society of Chemical Industry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available