4.5 Article

On the Commonality Between Theoretical Models for Fluid and Solid Friction, Wear and Tribochemistry

Journal

TRIBOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 59, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11249-015-0544-z

Keywords

Prandtl friction model; Eyring viscosity model; Wear; Fracture; Tribochemistry

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CMMI-1265742]
  2. EPSRC [EP/G026114/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G026114/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  5. Directorate For Engineering [1265742] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tribology is concerned with the influence of mechanically applied forces on interfacial phenomena that accompany and control sliding. A wide range of models has been developed to describe these phenomena, which include frictional dissipation, wear and tribochemical reactions. This paper shows that these apparently disparate models are based on the same fundamental concept that an externally applied force accelerates the rate of thermal transition of atoms or molecules across energy barriers present in solid and liquid materials, thereby promoting flow, slip or bond cleavage. Such stress-assisted effects and the associated thermal activation concepts were developed independently and in different forms by Prandtl (Z Angew Math Mech 8: 85, 1928) and Eyring (J Chem Phys 4(4): 283-291, 1936). These two works have underpinned subsequent theories of dry friction, boundary lubrication, EHD rheology, tribochemistry and nanoscale wear modelling. This paper first reviews the historical development of the concepts, focussing in particular on the models of Prandtl and Eyring and how they have subsequently been used and adapted by others. The two approaches are then compared and contrasted, noting that although superficially similar, they contain quite different assumptions and constraints. First, the Prandtl model assumes that the force is exerted through a compliant spring, while constant force sliding is assumed by Eyring. Second, different approximations are made in the two models to describe the change in energy barrier with external force. Prandtl explores the asymptotic behaviour of the energy barrier as the applied force become sufficiently high to reduce it to zero, while Eyring assumes that the energy barrier is reduced by an amount equal to the external work carried out on the system. The theoretical underpinnings of these differences are discussed along with the implications of compliant coupling and constant force sliding on the velocity and temperature dependence of the friction forces for the two models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available