4.1 Article

Smart homes and their users: a systematic analysis and key challenges

Journal

PERSONAL AND UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 463-476

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00779-014-0813-0

Keywords

Smart homes; Users; Technologies; Households; Energy; Assisted living

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/K002457/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/K002457/1, EP/K002430/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K002430/1, EP/K002457/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Published research on smart homes and their users is growing exponentially, yet a clear understanding of who these users are and how they might use smart home technologies is missing from a field being overwhelmingly pushed by technology developers. Through a systematic analysis of peer-reviewed literature on smart homes and their users, this paper takes stock of the dominant research themes and the linkages and disconnects between them. Key findings within each of nine themes are analysed, grouped into three: (1) views of the smart home-functional, instrumental, socio-technical; (2) users and the use of the smart home-prospective users, interactions and decisions, using technologies in the home; and (3) challenges for realising the smart home-hardware and software, design, domestication. These themes are integrated into an organising framework for future research that identifies the presence or absence of cross-cutting relationships between different understandings of smart homes and their users. The usefulness of the organising framework is illustrated in relation to two major concerns-privacy and control-that have been narrowly interpreted to date, precluding deeper insights and potential solutions. Future research on smart homes and their users can benefit by exploring and developing cross-cutting relationships between the research themes identified.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available