4.5 Article

Quantifying Wedge-Ice Volumes in Yedoma and Thermokarst Basin Deposits

Journal

PERMAFROST AND PERIGLACIAL PROCESSES
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 151-161

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ppp.1810

Keywords

permafrost; ground ice; polygonal networks; GIS; remote sensing; Arctic

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry of Science and Education [01DM12011]
  2. joint Russian-German project Polygons in Tundra Wetlands: State and Dynamics under Climate Variability in Polar Regions (German Research Foundation (DFG) [HE3622-16-1]
  3. DFG [UL426/1-1]
  4. NSF OPP (National Science Foundation Office for Polar Programs) [0732735]
  5. NASA [NNX08AJ37G]
  6. European Research Council (ERC) Starting Grant [338335]
  7. German National Academic Foundation
  8. Directorate For Geosciences
  9. Office of Polar Programs (OPP) [0732735] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wedge-ice volume (WIV) is a key factor in assessing the response of ice-rich permafrost landscapes to thaw and in quantifying deep permafrost soil carbon inventories. Here, we present a method for calculating WIV in late Pleistocene Yedoma deposits and Holocene thermokarst basin deposits at four study areas in Siberia and Alaska. Ice-wedge polygons and thermokarst mound (baydzherakh) patterns were mapped on different landscape units using very high-resolution (0.5 m/pixel) satellite imagery (WorldView-1 and GeoEye-1). In a geographic information system (GIS) environment, Thiessen polygons were automatically created to reconstruct relict ice-wedge polygonal networks, and field and published data on ice-wedge dimensions were used to generate three-dimensional subsurface models that distinguish between epi- and syngenetic ice-wedge geometry. The results reveal significant variations in WIV between the study sites and within certain terrain units. Calculated maximum WIV ranges from 31.4 to 63.2 vol% for Yedoma deposits and from 6.6 to 13.2 vol% for thermokarst basin deposits. Copyright (C) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available