4.4 Article

Designing a stepped wedge trial: three main designs, carry-over effects and randomisation approaches

Journal

TRIALS
Volume 16, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-0842-7

Keywords

Stepped wedge trials; Design; Methodology; Public health

Funding

  1. NIHR [RMOFS-2013-03-02]
  2. African Health Initiative of the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation for the Better Health Outcomes through Mentoring and Assessment stepped wedge trial [2009060]
  3. Terre des hommes for the Integrated e-Diagnosis Assessment stepped wedge trial
  4. MRC Network of Hubs for Trials Methodology Research [MR/L004933/1-P27]
  5. Medical Research Council [MR/K007467/1, MC_UU_12023/29, MR/K012126/1, MR/L004933/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. National Institute for Health Research [RMOFS-2013-03-02] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. MRC [MR/L004933/1, MC_UU_12023/29, MR/K007467/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: There is limited guidance on the design of stepped wedge cluster randomised trials. Current methodological literature focuses mainly on trials with cross-sectional data collection at discrete times, yet many recent stepped wedge trials do not follow this design. In this article, we present a typology to characterise the full range of stepped wedge designs, and offer guidance on several other design aspects. Methods: We developed a framework to define and report the key characteristics of a stepped wedge trial, including cluster allocation and individual participation. We also considered the relative strengths and weaknesses of trials according to this framework. We classified recently published stepped wedge trials using this framework and identified illustrative case studies. We identified key design choices and developed guidance for each. Results: We identified three main stepped wedge designs: those with a closed cohort, an open cohort, and a continuous recruitment short exposure design. In the first two designs, many individuals experience both control and intervention conditions. In the final design, individuals are recruited in continuous time as they become eligible and experience either the control or intervention condition, but not both, and then provide an outcome measurement at follow-up. While most stepped wedge trials use simple randomisation, stratification and restricted randomisation are often feasible and may be useful. Some recent studies collect outcome information from individuals exposed a long time before or after the rollout period, but this contributes little to the primary analysis. Incomplete designs should be considered when the intervention cannot be implemented quickly. Carry-over effects can arise in stepped wedge trials with closed and open cohorts. Conclusions: Stepped wedge trial designs should be reported more clearly. Researchers should consider the use of stratified and/or restricted randomisation. Trials should generally not commit resources to collect outcome data from individuals exposed a long time before or after the rollout period. Though substantial carry-over effects are uncommon in stepped wedge trials, researchers should consider their possibility before conducting a trial with closed or open cohorts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available