4.4 Article

Exercise-mimicking treatment fails to increase Fndc5 mRNA & irisin secretion in primary human myotubes

Journal

PEPTIDES
Volume 56, Issue -, Pages 1-7

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2014.03.003

Keywords

Fndc5; Irisin; Myokines; Exercise-mimicking treatment; Human myotubes; Type 2 diabetesa

Funding

  1. EFSD Lilly Research Fellowship [VEGA 2/0174/12]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Irisin, myokine secreted by skeletal muscle, was suggested to mediate some of exercise health benefits via browning of white adipose tissue. However, mounting evidence contradicts the regulatory role of exercise for muscle irisin production/secretion in humans. Thus, we explored the direct effect of exercise-mimicking treatment on irisin in human primary muscle cells in vitro. Human primary muscle cell cultures were established from lean, obese prediabetic and type-2-diabetic individuals. Complex metabolic phenotyping included assessment of insulin sensitivity (euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp) and adiposity content&distribution (MRI&MRS). In vitro exercise-mimicking treatment (forskolin + ionomycin) was delivered in 1-h pulse/day during differentiation. Fndc5 mRNA (qRT-PCR) and secreted irisin (ELISA) were determined in cells and media. Exercise-mimicking treatment more than doubled Pgcle e. mRNA in differentiated muscle cells. Nevertheless, Fndc5 mRNA was reduced by 18% and irisin in media by 20%. Moreover, Fncd5 mRNA was increased in myotubes derived from individuals with type-2-diabetes, independent on exercise-mimicking treatment. Fndc5 mRNA in cells was positively related to fasting glycemia (p= 0.0001) and negatively to whole-body insulin sensitivity (p <0.05). Collectively, our data do not support the role of exercise-related signaling pathways in irisin regulation in human skeletal muscle and confirm our previous observations on increased Fndc5 expression in muscle cells from individuals with type-2-diabetes. 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available