4.4 Article

Possible involvement of neuropeptide Y Y1 receptors in antidepressant like effect of agmatine in rats

Journal

PEPTIDES
Volume 47, Issue -, Pages 7-11

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2013.04.018

Keywords

Agmatine; Neuropeptide Y; NPY Y1 receptors; Depression; Immobility time; FST

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Agmatine and neuropeptide Y (NPY) are widely distributed in central nervous system and critically involved in modulation of depressive behavior in experimental animals. However their mutual interaction, if any, in regulation of depression remain largely unexplored. In the present study we explored the possible interaction between agmatine and neuropeptide Y in regulation of depression like behavior in forced swim test. We found that acute intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of agmatine (20-40 mu g/rat), NPY (5 and 10 mu g/rat) and NPY Y1 receptor agonist, [Leu(31), Pro(34)]-NPY (0.4 and 0.8 ng/rat) dose dependently decreased immobility time in forced swim test indicating their antidepressant like effects. In combination studies, the antidepressant like effect of agmatine (10 mu g/rat) was significantly potentiated by NPY (1 and 5 mu g/rat, icy) or [Leu(31), Pro(34)]-NPY (0.2 and 0.4 ng/rat, icv) pretreatment. Conversely, pretreatment of animals with NPY Y1 receptor antagonist, BIBP3226 (0.1 ng/rat, i.c.v.) completely blocked the antidepressant like effect of agmatine (20-40 mu g/rat) and its synergistic effect with NPY (1 mu g/rat, icv) or [Leu31, Pro34]-NPY (0.2 ng/rat, icv). The results of the present study showed that, agmatine exerts antidepressant like effects via NPYergic system possibly mediated by the NPY Y1 receptor subtypes and suggest that interaction between agmatine and neuropeptide Y may be relevant to generate the therapeutic strategies for the treatment of depression. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available