4.4 Review

Behavioral effects of neuropeptides in rodent models of depression and anxiety

Journal

PEPTIDES
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages 736-756

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2009.12.015

Keywords

Depression; Anxiety; Stress; Animal models; Corticotropin-releasing factor; Urocortin; Teneurin; Neuropeptide Y; Vasopressin; Oxytocin; Tyr-MIF-1; Cholecystokinin; Galanin; Substance P; Receptor antagonists

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [FRN: 7202762]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) f

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, studies have advocated neuropeptide systems as modulators for the behavioral states found in mood disorders such as depression and anxiety disorders. Neuropeptides have been tested in traditional animal models and screening procedures that have been validated by known antidepressants and anxiolytics. However, it has become clear that although these tests are very useful, neuropeptides have distinct behavioral effects and dose-dependent characteristics, and therefore, use of these tests with neuropeptides must be done with an understanding of their unique characteristics. This review will focus on the behavioral actions of neuropeptides and their synthetic analogs, particularly in studies utilizing various preclinical tests of depression and anxiety. Specifically, the following neuropeptide systems will be reviewed: corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), urocortin (Ucn), teneurin C-terminal associated peptide (TCAP), neuropeptide Y (NPY), arginine vasopressin (AVP), oxytocin, the Tyr-MIF-1 family, cholecystokinin (CCK), galanin, and substance P. These neuropeptide systems each have a unique role in the regulation of stress-like behavior, and therefore provide intriguing therapeutic targets for mood disorder treatment. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available