4.4 Article

Inhibition of human non-small cell lung cancers with a targeted cytotoxic somatostatin analog, AN-162

Journal

PEPTIDES
Volume 30, Issue 9, Pages 1643-1650

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2009.06.007

Keywords

Cytotoxic somatostatin analog AN-162; Non-small cell lung cancer; Somatostatin receptors; H460 xenograft; H1299 xenograft

Funding

  1. Medical Research Service of the Veterans Affairs Department and South Florida Veterans Affairs Foundation for Research and Education
  2. University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Departments of Pathology and Medicine, Division of Hernatology/Oncology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) express receptors for somatostatin. The cytotoxic analog of somatostatin AN-162 (AEZS-124), consisting of doxorubicin linked to a somatostatin analog RC-121 binds to receptors for somatostatin and is targeted to tumors expressing these receptors. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of targeted cytotoxic somatostatin analog AN-162 on a panel of human NSCLC cell lines (A549, H460, H838, H1299) in vitro (at 0.5-100 mu M concentrations) and in vivo on H460 and H1299 NSCLCs xenografted into nude mice (at the dose of 2.5 mu mol/kg, i.v., once a week). The expression of mRNA for somatostatin receptor subtypes was investigated by RT-PCR in cell lines and tumor tissues. Somatostatin receptor proteins were also characterized by ligand competition assay and Western blotting. AN-I 62 significantly decreased cell proliferation in vitro and tumor growth (p < 0.05 vs. all groups) of H460 and HI 299 NSCLCs in vivo. Based on real-time PCR array data, AN-I 62 induced several apoptosis-related genes in vivo in both models. Our results suggest that cytotoxic somatostatin analog AN-I 62 (AEZS-124) should be considered for the further development of a therapy of patients with NSCLC. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available