4.3 Article

Potential soil enzyme activities are decoupled from microbial activity in dry residue-amended soil

Journal

PEDOBIOLOGIA
Volume 55, Issue 5, Pages 253-261

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.pedobi.2012.04.003

Keywords

beta-Glucosidase activity; Protease activity; Soil moisture content; Ergosterol

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extracellular enzymes play an important role in the microbial acquisition of carbon (C) and organically bound nutrients, such as nitrogen (N). The objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of different soil moisture contents on potential soil enzyme activities (B-glucosidase and protease), microbial biomass and activity. Soil incubations were carried out with gravimetric moisture contents (GMC) ranging from 0.8 (air-dry) to 30%. After 14 days, respiration, net N mineralization and potential enzyme activities were lowest at GMC below 10% in the unamended samples. In the residue-amended soil, however, respiration and net N mineralization were highest at GMC of 20% or more, while potential beta-glucosidase and protease activity were highest at GMC of 10% or less. Increasing the moisture content of air-dry soil after 14 days of incubation resulted in significantly reduced beta-glucosidase activity, but increased protease activity. With the exception of the high potential beta-glucosidase activity in the residue-amended dry soil, enzyme activities were well correlated with microbial biomass and ergosterol, a biomarker for fungal biomass. Therefore, our results suggest that across the different GMC, protease activity was mainly dependent on the continuous production by microorganisms, while beta-glucosidase accumulated in the dry soil due to an increased half-life, which was the result of interactions with soil colloids. Shifts in microbial community composition may also have contributed to the observed differences. (c) 2012 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available