4.7 Review

Parental Financial Incentives for Increasing Preschool Vaccination Uptake: Systematic Review

Journal

PEDIATRICS
Volume 134, Issue 4, Pages E1117-E1128

Publisher

AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2014-1279

Keywords

child; preschool; incentives; motivation; vaccination

Categories

Funding

  1. UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme
  2. Fuse: the Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, a UK Clinical Research Collaboration Public Health Research Centre of Excellence
  3. British Heart Foundation
  4. Cancer Research UK
  5. Economic and Social Research Council
  6. Medical Research Council
  7. National Institute for Health Research, under the auspices of the UK Clinical Research Collaboration
  8. Medical Research Council [MR/K02325X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. National Institute for Health Research [11/97/01, CDF-2011-04-001] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [CDF-2011-04-001] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Financial incentives have been used to promote vaccination uptake but are not always viewed as acceptable. Quasimandatory policies, such as requiring vaccinations for school enrollment, are widely implemented in some countries. A systematic review was conducted to determine the effectiveness, acceptability, and economic costs and consequences of parental financial incentives and quasimandatory schemes for increasing the uptake of preschool vaccinations in high-income countries. METHODS: Electronic databases and gray literature were searched for randomized controlled trials, controlled before-and-after studies, and time series analyses examining the effectiveness of parental financial incentives and quasimandatory schemes, as well as any empirical studies exploring acceptability. All included studies were screened for information on economic costs and consequences. Two reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed the quality of selected articles by using established instruments. Studies were synthesized in narrative reviews. RESULTS: Four studies on the effectiveness and 6 on the acceptability of parental financial incentives and quasimandatory interventions met the inclusion criteria. Only 1 study reported on costs and consequences. Studies of effectiveness had low risk of bias but displayed substantial heterogeneity in terms of interventions and methods. CONCLUSIONS: There was insufficient evidence to conclude whether these interventions were effective. Studies of acceptability suggested a preference, in settings where this already occurs, for incentives linking vaccinations to access to education. There was insufficient evidence to draw conclusions on economic costs and consequences.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available