4.7 Article

Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prophylaxis in Down Syndrome: A Prospective Cohort Study

Journal

PEDIATRICS
Volume 133, Issue 6, Pages 1031-1037

Publisher

AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2013-3916

Keywords

respiratory syncytial virus; palivizumab; Down syndrome; outcomes

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Children with Down syndrome (DS) are at significant risk for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection and related hospitalization. We compared hospitalization rates due to respiratory tract infection in children with DS aged,2 years who prospectively received palivizumab during the RSV season with a previously published, similar untreated DS birth cohort. METHODS: A total of 532 children with DS who prospectively received palivizumab were assembled from the prospective Canadian RSV Evaluation Study of Palivizumab registry between 2005 and 2012. The untreated group included 233 children with DS derived from a nationwide Dutch birth cohort from 2003 to 2005. Events during the RSV seasons were counted. Poisson regression analysis was performed to compare incidence rate ratios (95% confidence intervals [Cls]) between groups while controlling for observation length and known risk factors for severe RSV infection. RESULTS: In total, 31 (23 untreated, 8 treated) RSV-related hospitalizations were documented. The adjusted risk of RSV-related hospitalizations was higher in untreated subjects than in palivizumab recipients (incidence rate ratio 3.63; 95% Cl, 1.52-8.67). The adjusted risk of hospitalization for all respiratory tract infection (147 events; 73 untreated, 74 treated) was similar (incidence rate ratio untreated versus palivizumab 1.11; 95% Cl, 0.80-1.55). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that palivizumab is associated with a 3.6-fold reduction in the incidence rate ratio for RSV-related hospitalization in children with DS during the first 2 years of life. A randomized trial is needed to determine the efficacy of RSV immunoprophylaxis in this specific high-risk patient population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available