4.7 Article

Off-Label Topical Calcineurin Inhibitor Use in Children

Journal

PEDIATRICS
Volume 132, Issue 5, Pages E1327-E1332

Publisher

AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2013-0931

Keywords

topical calcineurin inhibitors; pharmacoepidemiology; off-label drug use

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: To assess off-label use of the topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs), tacrolimus and pimecrolimus, in children during periods before and after regulatory action by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2005. METHODS: We identified new pediatric (age <20 years) users of topical tacrolimus or pimecrolimus in US Medicaid from 2001 to 2009, and examined the annual rate of drug use (pre-and postregulatory action) by age. We assessed medical claims for diagnoses consistent with an indication for a TCI, and assessed prescriptions for evidence of first-line atopic dermatitis therapy use before TCI initiation. RESULTS: There were 57 664 eligible pediatric tacrolimus users and 425 242 eligible pediatric pimecrolimus users at baseline. The rate of TCI use decreased substantially after FDA regulatory action. The proportion of new users younger than 2 years of age significantly decreased for both tacrolimus (36.7% to 22.5%, P,.001) and pimecrolimus (47.0% to 33.7%, P < .001) after regulatory actions. Previous use of topical corticosteroids increased by similar to 7% for both TCIs from the pre-to postregulatory period. However, after regulatory actions, there was only a small increase in the proportion of tacrolimus or pimecrolimus users with an atopic dermatitis or eczema diagnosis before drug initiation, and high strength use of tacrolimus was unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of TCI use in children younger than 2 years of age fell substantially after FDA regulatory action in 2005. Off-label use of TCI as first-line therapy changed little.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available